Now and then …

This location has always had a bit of a tug on my memory strings, for more than one reason, one very good, one nearly very bad! It was here on my first photo workshop with Nick Jenkins that the penny dropped for me on how to compose an image, rather than just take a picture. It was also the spot that a fellow workshop-attendee nearly tipped me into Stainforth Force with all my gear, tripod and all – it would have been a very clumsy accident. If he’d succeeded there would never have been any “Moments like these”!!

So when I had the opportunity to re-visit Stainforth Force in the Ribble Valley, I thought it would be a good exercise to see how my new camera and lenses, coupled with my improved Lightroom skills (hopefully) could handle the same composition that I’d liked so much, 8 years previously.

Bubbling & foaming 2018

Stainforth Force, Ribble Valley

Above is the shot I took, straight out of the camera and “pin-sharp” (Sony A7r) this October. [7360x4912px, cropped to 5466x3648px, to match the 2010 image].
[EXIF details 1/8sec @ f22, ISO 50, Sony FE24-105 F4 G OSS lens @ Focal Length 57mm]

Bubbling & foaming 2018

Stainforth Force, Ribble Valley

After processing in Lightroom Classic CC – White Balance set to Cloudy, Auto tone chosen (thought I’d test how good that would be, and also thought it would be an interesting base-line comparison to the earlier shot) with a little increase in the Vibrance (from +13 to +18) and Saturation (from -2 to +4), and Clarity (+18) added, I got the shot above which I think is quite nice.

Bubbling and foaming 2010

Stainforth Force, Ribble Valley

Above is the earlier November 2010 shot straight from the camera (Sony A770 – DSLR – 12 megapixel sensor) [4272x2848px cropped to 4272x1898px].
[EXIF: 1/6sec @ f32, ISO 200, Sony DT16-105 F3.5-5.6 lens @ Focal Length 40mm]

Bubbling and foaming 2010

Stainforth Force, Ribble Valley

If I’d processed the shot in Lightroom “then” as the one above “now” it would have looked like the one above – White Balance set to Cloudy, Auto tone chosen, with Clarity (+18) added to the Vibrance (+18) and Saturation (4) settings (similar to those chosen for the 2018 image). If I’d left it like that (which was quite true to the day actually), it would have left me with an image that is rather flat and uninteresting, I feel.

Bubbling and foaming 2010

Stainforth Force, Ribble Valley

However the shot above is how I did process the image, dragging down the Highlights to get some blue sky and accentuating the autumn colours with high Vibrance and Saturation values. Doing this turned a flat image into one that has always been one of my favourites.

Is one better than the other? Probably not – they’re different. The 2018 image is sharper reflecting the better camera sensor and lens. The techniques used were virtually identical. The post-processing is the difference between the two images, the 2018 image really couldn’t take too much alteration otherwise it would have looked false, so it was the post-processing (and the season) that maked the earlier image stand-out and still remain one of my favourites. Do you agree?

If you like this blog please Subscribe to it using the boxes below. I’m not going to publicise posts on Facebook any more.

This entry was posted in Clarity, Landscape, Lightroom, Photography, River, Saturation, Vibrance and tagged , , , , , , , , , .

6 Comments

  1. Jan October 22, 2018 at 13:50 #

    Pretty impressive ! Beautiful scenery.

    • David October 22, 2018 at 14:00 #

      Thanks Jan, it is a lovely spot. I re-visited it with a sense of whether there was any chance of deja-vu, and being by myself just a little bit worried that the Force was not going to be with me!! But all was well, and I survived to tell the tale!

  2. jane hack October 22, 2018 at 16:31 #

    It’s very beautiful. And best taken from the safety of dry land!! 🤣

    • David October 22, 2018 at 18:01 #

      Indeed!

  3. Jim Bartlett October 29, 2018 at 07:21 #

    I prefer the earlier shot, David, partly because more of the bridge is visible, and partly because the green foliage in the later one is too prominent for my taste. I like the slightly higher viewpoint though.

    • David October 29, 2018 at 12:09 #

      It’s an interesting one Jim. I tend to agree with you, but the truth of the matter is that the more recent one has far less Lightroom intervention and the resolution is so much better. Amazing the difference in the lens and sensor if you zoom in close. But as you say the overwhelming green detracts from the image, and the autumn colours really make the shot, thus telling evidence that season is a very important component in composition, as is light of course – which was far better in the later shot, but which I was able to enhance (RAW image) by changing the highlights quite a bit!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*